Zen and mind-part I

Having studied Zen for many years, and is understood to not really understand, in particular the concepts of ' mind/no-mind ' or ' something/no-thing '. Once in the past on the intellectual aspects of Zen, I discovered that the more edits would ever and is the basis of mental acumen are related to one of the highest beingness. Even though sometimes I should dump my head with all that, there's something puzzling mind except for the parameters not understood in an attempt to explain this issue intellectually. Where has stopped doing so, except the dissertation, which is used to explain the virtues and virtues of Zen with-or without.

Huang Bo Hakeem was known Syed "Chinese chan (Zen) known in Japanese APCO, creating misunderstanding intensive students left in case of extreme mental and making them think they have to implement mandatory procedures, follow certain rituals, and speaking of ridiculous attempt. Of course, Zen, seeks only to Zen.

Regardless, there is still a misunderstanding what Zen really is not. Zen pop is really Zen, but not a zine, and even very misleading. Titles like "Zen and the art" is just bizarre and confusing concepts that people think that learned nihilism and total aonatachmint as detachment is the solution. This is also the zine, but this is not what I Zayn either. It's easy to see why an incredible mental blocks when trying to understand Zen by using so-called one mind, alleging its own it is not the way to understand is that there is nothing to understand.

However, I intend to speak on Zen in sentences. And speak directly to myself when writing, the way I am able to explain to anyone if accepted will be but they already enlightened, and need the life they are living, is illusion, allusion, illusion in best cases. This is particularly true when trying to control a specific area once time filler.

It might seem great philosophical writings zine supporters hip for many readers who want to understand knowledge Cole of Zen. Zen thanks you and laugh at the same time. I tried many writers and teachers to explain concepts and was very successful in doing so either intellectually or by example. I do the same thing, but linked to today in easily understood relationships. Not only that they do not, but more so to do by myself, which could also be interpreted as silly. I'm not using Zen Buddhist terminology but clarify ideas and principles which you in-depth, reader questions and realize that you are already enlightened if really not needed enlightenment either. You won't have to reflect on the ideas put forward, but you should think about it. The genuine desire to understand what Zen is all about, then you must accept first that you can do already. Zen many fun, especially if you don't take it seriously. On the other hand, if you don't take it seriously, more fun.

Question: "are you the master of Zen?"
Sensei: "Yes, I am!"

Question: "are you a true Syed Zain?"
Sensei: "Yes, I am!"

Question: "can you explain what Zen?"
Sensei: "Yes, I can!"

Question: "are you?"
Sensei: "Yes, I will!"

Question: "when?"
Sensei: "I have done."